English Refresher

C1 Advanced — Reading & Use of English: Test 2, Parts 5–8 | English Refresher
C1 Advanced · Reading & Use of English

Reading Mastery
Test 2 · Parts 5–8

A second exam-style reading set that marks every answer instantly and shows you the exact line that proves it.

26 questions · 42 marks Suggested time: 45 min Instant feedback CEFR estimate
How this workbook works. Read each text, then answer the questions. Feedback appears the moment you choose, pointing you to the evidence in the text. When you finish, press See my result for a CEFR estimate and personalized advice.
5
Multiple choice

Reading for detail and opinion

Read the text and answer questions 31–36, choosing the answer (A, B, C or D) that fits best. Two marks each.

Strategy, tips & common traps

What it tests: detail, opinion, attitude, tone, implication, and the meaning of words in context.

  • Read the whole text for general meaning first; the questions follow the order of the text.
  • Find the exact line that proves your answer.
  • Distractors often repeat words from the text but twist the meaning — match ideas, not vocabulary.
  • For attitude questions, watch adjectives, adverbs, and irony.

At first glance, Daniel Vance does not look like a champion of anything. Softly spoken and unfailingly modest, he has the slightly distracted air of someone perpetually lost in thought. Yet twice now he has been crowned national memory champion, capable of memorizing the order of a shuffled pack of cards in under thirty seconds, or hundreds of random digits in a matter of minutes. What is most surprising, he insists, is that anyone could learn to do the same.

Vance is at pains to dispel the myth that memory champions are born with extraordinary brains. “I had a perfectly ordinary memory growing up,” he says. “In fact, I was famous in my family for forgetting birthdays.” His talent, he maintains, is entirely the product of technique and practice — a claim supported by neuroscientists, who have found no anatomical difference between the brains of memory champions and those of everyone else. The difference lies not in the hardware, but in how it is used.

The methods Vance uses are, he admits, almost absurdly old-fashioned. The most powerful, known as the “memory palace”, dates back to the ancient Greeks. The idea is to associate each item one wishes to remember with a specific location along a familiar route — one’s childhood home, say. To recall the information, one simply takes an imaginary walk, collecting the items along the way. It sounds laborious, and at first it is. With practice, however, the process becomes almost instantaneous.

What draws people to such an unusual pursuit? For Vance, the appeal was never competition itself. He stumbled into the world of memory sport almost by accident, after reading a magazine article during a dull commute. What hooked him, he says, was the discovery that a skill he had always assumed to be fixed could in fact be transformed. “It changed how I thought about my own potential,” he reflects. “If I could rewire my memory, what else might I be capable of?”

He is careful, though, not to oversell the practical benefits. People often assume that a trained memory must make everyday life effortless, but Vance laughs at the suggestion. “I still lose my keys,” he admits. The techniques, he explains, require deliberate effort to apply; they do not run automatically in the background. A memory palace is a tool, not a superpower, and like any tool it is useless unless you actually pick it up.

If anything, Vance worries that the rise of digital technology is making memory training seem pointless. Why memorize anything, the argument goes, when a phone can store it all? He finds this attitude short-sighted. The value of a good memory, he argues, lies not in the facts themselves but in what having them readily available allows the mind to do. Knowledge stored in one’s head can be combined, compared, and built upon in a way that information locked in a device cannot. “You can’t have an original thought,” he says, “about something you have to look up.”

It is a characteristically thoughtful observation from a man who, despite his achievements, remains faintly puzzled by his own fame. As our conversation ends, he is already gathering his things to leave — and, with a wry smile, checking three times that he has remembered his umbrella.

6
Cross-text multiple matching

Comparing opinions

Four commentators (A–D) give their views on government spending on space exploration. For questions 37–40, choose the writer (A, B, C or D) the question describes. Two marks each.

Strategy, tips & common traps

What it tests: tracking and comparing opinions across several texts — who agrees, who differs.

  • Build a quick grid: each writer’s stance on each issue (for / against).
  • The texts share a topic but differ in opinion. Underline the opinion.
  • “Different view from the others” means three agree and one stands apart.
  • “Shares X’s view” means find the one writer who matches X on that point.

Writer A

Those who complain about the cost of space programs forget how much we have gained from them. The technologies developed for spaceflight — from medical scanners to weather forecasting — quietly improve millions of lives every day, and that investment more than pays for itself. I would, however, resist the current rush to hand the whole enterprise over to private corporations. Space is a common good, and its exploration should be led by governments accountable to the public, not by billionaires pursuing their own ambitions. There is no need to hurry; a measured, well-funded national effort, pursued patiently over decades, will achieve far more than a reckless race.

Writer B

I find it hard to justify vast public spending on space while problems here on Earth remain unsolved. The money poured into rockets would, in my view, do far more good invested in hospitals and schools. The supposed practical benefits are, frankly, exaggerated; most of those “space spin-offs” would have been invented anyway. If wealthy individuals wish to fund their own expeditions, that is their affair — better their money than the taxpayer’s. And there is certainly no urgency: the universe has waited billions of years; it can wait a few more decades until we have put our own house in order.

Writer C

The economic case for space exploration is, to my mind, beyond dispute. The research it drives has given us countless practical tools, and the industries it has created employ hundreds of thousands of people. Where I differ from the traditionalists is over who should be in charge. Private companies have proved far more efficient and innovative than slow-moving government agencies, and I see every reason to let them lead. That said, I am wary of those who treat space as some kind of emergency. We are not running out of time; this is a project for the coming century, to be done carefully rather than quickly.

Writer D

I am a firm supporter of space exploration, though not for the reasons usually given. The claim that it delivers a stream of useful gadgets is, I suspect, overstated and beside the point. What matters is that humanity faces real threats — from asteroids to the eventual exhaustion of our planet — and we cannot afford to be complacent. For that reason, I believe we must press ahead now, with real urgency, rather than treating space as a leisurely project for future generations. And since private firms can move faster than any government department, it makes sense to let them take the lead.

7
Gapped text

Following the argument

Six paragraphs have been removed from the article below. Choose from paragraphs A–G the one that fits each gap (41–46). There is one extra paragraph you do not need. Two marks each.

Strategy, tips & common traps

What it tests: cohesion and coherence — how ideas connect across a text.

  • Read the whole base text first to grasp the argument.
  • Track reference words: this, that, such, they, the explanation.
  • Check the sentence after the gap as well as before; the paragraph must link to both.
  • The extra paragraph is designed to tempt you. Place it last.

We have all felt it: that shiver of wonder at a night sky thick with stars, or standing at the foot of a vast mountain. For most of human history, such moments of awe were treated as the province of poets and priests. Recently, however, they have become the subject of serious scientific study.

41

What this research has revealed is that awe is far more than a pleasant feeling. Experiencing it appears to change us, at least temporarily, in measurable ways. People who have just felt awe behave more generously, think more clearly, and report a greater sense of connection to those around them.

42

The explanation, researchers suggest, lies in awe’s curious effect on the sense of self. In the presence of something vast — whether a canyon, a cathedral, or a piece of music — the boundaries of the individual ego seem to soften. Our own concerns, so pressing a moment before, suddenly feel small.

43

This “shrinking of the self” might sound unsettling, but most people experience it as a profound relief. Freed briefly from the endless chatter of self-interest, they feel part of something larger. It is no coincidence that awe is central to almost every religious tradition.

44

If awe is so good for us, an obvious question follows: can we have more of it? Here the news is encouraging. Researchers have found that awe is far more available than we tend to assume, and that it does not require a journey to the Grand Canyon.

45

Everyday life, it turns out, is full of potential triggers, for those willing to pay attention. A towering tree, a striking building, an act of unexpected kindness — all can produce the same effect, provided we slow down enough to notice them.

46

Perhaps that is the most practical lesson of this research. In an age that prizes speed and self-promotion, awe offers a quiet corrective — a reminder that we are small, that the world is vast, and that this is nothing to be afraid of.

A. Psychologists have a name for this sensation: the “small self”. Far from diminishing us, they argue, it puts our problems into a healthier perspective.
B. The trick, the scientists suggest, is simply to build small pauses into the day — to look up from the screen, and out at the world.
C. Of course, not every powerful emotion is good for us, and some psychologists caution that awe can occasionally tip over into fear.
D. Over the past two decades, psychologists have begun to investigate awe in the laboratory, measuring its effects on everything from mood to behavior. Their findings have surprised even the researchers themselves.
E. In one experiment, volunteers who had gazed up at a grove of towering trees were afterwards far more likely to help a stranger who dropped a handful of pens than those who had stared at a plain building.
F. In fact, the researchers found that the most reliable source of awe was not nature at all, but other people — their courage, their skill, their kindness.
G. Stripped of its supernatural explanations, then, awe begins to look less like a luxury and more like a basic psychological need.
8
Multiple matching

Scanning for detail

Read about four people who left the city to live in the countryside. For questions 47–56, choose from the people (A–D). The people may be chosen more than once. One mark each.

Strategy, tips & common traps

What it tests: locating specific information and paraphrased detail quickly.

  • Read the questions first, then scan the texts for the detail.
  • The answer almost always paraphrases the question rather than repeating its words.
  • People can be chosen more than once, so don’t assume an even spread.
  • Confirm by re-reading the exact sentence before you commit.

A — Elena

We moved out of the city mainly for the children. In a cramped flat with no garden, they had nowhere to run, and we longed to give them space to grow up. The village has been wonderfully welcoming, and I have never regretted the decision — though I won’t pretend there are no drawbacks. What I miss most is the culture: the theaters, the galleries, the little independent cinemas that I used to take for granted. My salary fell sharply when I switched to freelance work so that I could live out here, but somehow we manage, and we are undoubtedly happier than we were before.

B — Marcus

I left the city because I was completely burned out, and I imagined the countryside would be peaceful. In a way I was wrong: I had no idea how much there is to do out here, from maintaining the house to clearing paths after a storm — I am busier now than I ever was at my desk. The hardest part, at the beginning, was the loneliness; for the first few months I barely spoke to anyone and seriously wondered if I’d made a mistake. I was lucky in one respect, though: my company let me keep my old job and work from home, so at least my income never changed.

C — Priya

Everyone thought I was mad. Leaving a secure career to open a small guesthouse in the middle of nowhere seemed, to my family at least, like throwing my future away. I understood their doubts, but I had always dreamed of being my own boss. The reality has been hard but rewarding. My biggest daily frustration, believe it or not, is the internet: the connection is so slow that running an online booking system can be a nightmare. I also miss being able to pop to a shop at midnight. Even so, the gentler pace of life suits me far better than the rush of the city ever did.

D — Tom

Unlike most of my neighbors, I am not really an incomer: I grew up in this valley and only moved back after fifteen years in the city. Returning felt like coming home, and I quickly fell back in with friends I had known since school. I do get impatient, though, with newcomers who arrive expecting some kind of rural paradise. Country life can be cold, muddy, and isolating, and romanticizing it does no one any favors. For me, the real reward is the silence. As a writer, I need long stretches of quiet to think, and here, at last, I have found them.

This is a practice estimate for one section. Your official Cambridge result is calculated across the whole exam on the Cambridge English Scale.

English Refresher · C1 Advanced · Test 2 · Reading Parts 5–8