C1 Advanced · Reading · Module 2, Lesson 3

Part 7: Gapped Text

One long text, six paragraphs removed, seven to choose from. The examiners are testing cohesion across a denser, more abstract argument than at B2 level.

6 gaps 2 marks each (12 total) 15 min target 7 sentences, one extra
Learn

What this part really tests

Part 7 removes six sentences from a longer, denser text and gives you seven to put back — one fits nowhere. At C1, the argument often moves through concession, contrast, and qualification, so the cohesion clues are frequently logical rather than a simple shared noun or pronoun.

The examiner's method

  1. Read the whole base text first, ignoring the gaps, to follow the overall shape of the argument.
  2. At each gap, check what comes immediately before and after it — the missing sentence must connect to both.
  3. Track pronouns and referencing words, but also track the logical move being made — concession, contrast, example, or conclusion.
  4. Watch for structures like "by contrast," "this may seem counterintuitive," or "neither... nor" — they often presuppose specific content that must appear in the gap.
  5. Fill the gaps you're confident about first, then use elimination for the rest.
  6. One option never fits anywhere. If a sentence only "sounds plausible" without matching the logic on both sides, it's the extra.

Traps that catch even strong candidates

Pronoun mismatch
A sentence fits the topic, but its pronoun or determiner doesn't match anything nearby.
Topic drift
The sentence is about the right general subject, but doesn't link to the exact idea just before or after it.
The lonely extra
One option is written to sound plausible on its own, but fits no gap once you check the cohesion on both sides.
Presupposed content
A following sentence says "neither change..." or "by contrast..." — the gap must supply the exact content those words presuppose.
Missing concession
A sentence starting "this may seem..." needs the gap to state the counterintuitive claim being conceded, not just a related fact.
First-glance answer
Choosing a sentence because it "sounds right" for the topic, without checking the specific logical link either side.

Worked example

"Caffeine can improve alertness and short-term focus for many people. ___ The compound works by blocking a chemical in the brain that normally signals tiredness, rather than creating new energy from nothing."

A However, its effects vary enormously between individuals depending on genetics and tolerance. B This effect has a specific biological explanation, rather than being purely psychological. C Many students prefer tea to coffee for this exact reason.
  1. Look at what follows the gap: "The compound works by blocking a chemical..." — this needs a sentence that promises a biological explanation is coming.
  2. Option A is true and plausible, but it's about individual variation, a different sub-topic the next sentence never returns to.
  3. Option C introduces tea, which is never mentioned again — a topic-drift trap.
  4. Option B explicitly promises "a specific biological explanation," which is exactly what "the compound works by blocking a chemical" then delivers.
  5. Answer: B.
Try

Micro-trainer — a shorter gapped text

Four gaps, five sentences to choose from (one is extra). Pick the sentence that fits each gap on both sides.

Why Multitasking While Studying Doesn't Work

Many students study with a phone nearby, a series playing in the background, or several tabs open, convinced that their brain can handle more than one demanding task at once. (1) What actually happens, cognitive researchers argue, is not true simultaneous processing but extremely fast switching between tasks, and each switch carries a small but real cost in time and accuracy.

(2) Even a brief glance at a notification, lasting only a few seconds, has been shown to disrupt concentration for several minutes afterward, since attention does not snap back to full focus the instant the phone is put back down.

Some students argue that background music or television helps them concentrate by blocking out silence. (3) The nature of the material matters more than the mere presence of noise: instrumental, unfamiliar music causes far less disruption than anything containing lyrics or spoken dialogue a person can understand. (4) Simply closing unnecessary tabs and turning a phone screen-down, rather than relying on willpower alone to ignore it, removes most of the temptation before it even has a chance to interrupt a study session.

Sentences A–E (one does not fit anywhere)

A Taking short breaks every hour has been shown to help maintain focus over a long study session, regardless of the task involved.
B There is some truth to this, but the research is more specific than a simple yes-or-no answer.
C This is described technically as multitasking, though the term is somewhat misleading.
D The most reliable strategy, though, has less to do with choosing the right background sound and more to do with removing potential distractions before they can occur at all.
E The accumulated cost of constant switching is larger than most people intuitively expect.
Try score: 0 / 4
Ready for the real thing? Scroll down to Apply — a brand new full-length text in exact exam format, against the clock.
Apply

Exam-format practice

A new full-length text, official Part 7 format: 6 gaps, 7 sentences. Aim to finish before the timer runs out.

15:00

How to Actually Remember What You Study

Most students, when preparing for an exam, default to rereading notes or highlighting a textbook repeatedly, mistaking the growing sense of familiarity for genuine mastery. (1) Cognitive scientists have spent decades studying which study techniques actually produce durable, retrievable memory, and rereading consistently ranks among the least effective, despite its enduring popularity.

The single most consistently effective technique identified in this research is retrieval practice: forcing yourself to recall information from memory without looking at the source, rather than simply re-exposing yourself to it. (2) Every time information is successfully retrieved under some degree of difficulty, that act of retrieval strengthens the memory far more than passively reviewing the same material again would.

Spacing these retrieval attempts out over days or weeks, rather than compressing them into a single cramming session, produces dramatically better long-term retention. (3) A certain amount of forgetting between sessions is not a failure of the method; it is precisely what makes the next retrieval attempt effortful enough to strengthen the memory meaningfully.

A related but distinct technique, known as interleaving, involves mixing several different but related topics or problem types within a single study session, rather than mastering one completely before moving to the next. (4) Blocked practice, by contrast, can create an illusion of fluency that quickly evaporates once problems appear in an unpredictable, mixed order, such as on an actual exam.

None of this feels particularly pleasant while it's happening, and that is exactly the point. (5) Researchers have taken to calling this kind of productive struggle a "desirable difficulty" — a signal that real learning is underway, not evidence that a technique has failed.

Translating all of this into an actual study routine is simpler than it might sound. (6) Neither change requires more study time overall; both simply redirect the same number of hours toward the techniques the evidence actually supports.

Sentences A–G (one does not fit anywhere)

A Handwriting notes by hand, rather than typing them, has been associated with slightly better retention in some studies, though the effect size is modest.
B Mixing problem types this way forces the brain to actively identify which strategy or concept applies before attempting a solution, rather than mechanically repeating the same single procedure ten times in a row.
C This sense of fluency, as researchers call it, is a notoriously unreliable predictor of how well the material has actually been retained.
D It largely comes down to two adjustments: closing the book to test recall instead of rereading, and mixing older material back into new study sessions instead of studying it once and moving on.
E This may seem counterintuitive, since a full day or more without reviewing the material often allows some of it to be forgotten in between.
F Closing the book and trying to write down everything you remember about a topic, then checking what was missed, is a simple version of this in practice.
G Effortful recall and spaced-out review both feel distinctly harder than smoothly rereading a highlighted page, and that heightened effort is not a warning sign to be avoided.

Your result

Score0 / 6
Percentage0%

This is a practice estimate for one exam part only. Your official Cambridge result is calculated across the whole exam on the Cambridge English Scale.

Saved. Your progress on the course map will update the next time you visit it.