C1 Advanced · Listening · Module 4, Lesson 3

Part 3: Long Interview

One extended discussion, six multiple-choice questions in order. The examiners are testing sustained comprehension of an abstract, opinion-rich conversation — often between an interviewer and an expert with a developed argument.

6 items 1 mark each (6 total) ~9 min target 3 options, A–C · heard twice
Learn

What this part really tests

Part 3 plays one longer discussion — often an expert being interviewed about a nuanced topic. Questions follow the conversation's order and often test the expert's actual position on a debate, including qualifications and reservations, not just their initial statement.

The examiner's method

  1. Read all six questions before you press play — they trace the shape of the expert's overall argument.
  2. Track the expert's position as it develops; a C1 speaker often qualifies or complicates their own opening claim.
  3. Distinguish between what the host suggests and what the expert actually confirms or corrects.
  4. Listen for concluding statements ("realistically...", "on balance...") — they often carry the tested overall message.
  5. Don't assume the first plausible-sounding answer is correct if the expert later refines or contradicts it.
  6. Use the second listen to confirm any question that depended on inferring attitude rather than stated fact.

Traps that cost marks

Partial agreement
The expert partly agrees with a common view, then adds an important qualification — the qualification is usually tested.
Host's framing vs. expert's answer
The host's question may contain a simplified assumption that the expert's answer directly complicates or rejects.
Overall-message trap
A question about the expert's final message wants the concluding, balanced view — not an earlier, more extreme-sounding point.

Worked example

Host: "So working from home is simply better for productivity?" Expert: "Better is too strong a word. For some roles and some people, certainly. But the research is far more mixed than headlines suggest, and for collaborative, creative work, it can actually make coordination harder."

Question: How does the expert respond to the host's suggestion?

A By fully agreeing with it B By complicating it, noting it depends on the type of work C By rejecting it entirely
  1. The expert says "Better is too strong a word" — this rules out full agreement (A).
  2. But they don't reject it outright either — "for some roles and some people, certainly" rules out C.
  3. The nuance is that it "depends" — coordination gets harder specifically for "collaborative, creative work."
  4. Answer: B.
Try

Micro-trainer — a short discussion first

Read all three questions below before you press play. The recording is heard twice, exactly as in the real exam.

Try score: 0 / 3
Ready for the real thing? Scroll down to Apply — a brand new full-length interview in exact exam format, against the clock.
Apply

Exam-format practice

A new full-length interview, official Part 3 format, six questions. Aim to finish before the timer runs out — then check your answers below.

09:00

Your result

Score0 / 6
Percentage0%

This is a practice estimate for one exam part only. Your official Cambridge result is calculated across the whole exam on the Cambridge English Scale.

Saved. Your progress on the course map will update the next time you visit it.