B2 First · Speaking · Module 5, Lesson 3

Part 3: Collaborative Task

You and your partner get a discussion question with five written prompts, and you talk it through together — then agree on something in the final minute. This is the one part of the test that's genuinely a conversation, not two people taking turns to speak.

~4 min total Discuss, then decide One question + 5 written prompts Both candidates together
Learn

What this part really tests

You and your partner are given a discussion question together with five short written prompts, and asked to talk about it for about two minutes — you don't have to use every prompt. Then the interlocutor asks a follow-up question and gives you about a minute to work toward an actual decision. Interactive Communication is the headline criterion here — can you genuinely interact, not just wait your turn to say your own opinion.

The examiner's method

  1. You'll get about 15 seconds to look at the question and the five prompts before you start — use it to pick two or three you have real ideas about.
  2. You don't have to use all five prompts, and you don't have to discuss them in order — go deeper on a few rather than rushing through all five.
  3. Actively invite your partner in ("What do you think about this one?", "Do you agree?").
  4. Respond to what your partner actually says before adding a new point of your own — react, then add.
  5. When the interlocutor asks the follow-up decision question, work together toward an actual answer in the final minute — you won't lose marks for failing to fully agree, but you will for not really trying.

Language for a real discussion

Inviting an opinion
What do you think? · Would you agree that…? · What about this one?
Agreeing
That's a good point. · I hadn't thought of that, but… · Exactly, and also…
Disagreeing politely
I see what you mean, but I think… · I'm not so sure about that… · That's true, although…
Reaching a decision
So shall we say…? · Given everything we've said, I think… · Let's go with…

Traps that cost marks

Two monologues
Each of you stating your own opinion on every prompt with zero reaction to what your partner just said.
Trying to cover all five
Forcing in all five prompts instead of exploring two or three in real depth spreads the discussion too thin.
No real attempt at a decision
You won't be penalized just for disagreeing, but drifting into silence instead of genuinely trying to negotiate an answer costs marks.
Dominating or disappearing
Talking over your partner the whole time, or staying so passive you barely speak — both hurt Interactive Communication.

Worked example

The discussion card looks like this — a question plus five short written prompts, not pictures:

Some people think part-time jobs are a good idea for students, and other people disagree. Here are some things they think about:

earning money time management work experience exam stress making friends

Weak: "I think earning money is the best reason. Time management is also good. Work experience is fine too." (A partner adds: "I think exam stress is the biggest issue." Neither reacts to the other; the exchange ends without a joint decision.)

Strong: A: "I keep coming back to the work-experience angle — what do you think?" B: "That's a good point, though I actually think time management might matter more long-term. What made you pick experience?" A: "Mostly that it looks good later, but you're right that time management is something they'll need for the rest of their life. Maybe we say time management, since it also helps with the exam-stress side?" B: "Yeah, let's go with that."

  1. The strong exchange opens by inviting the partner in directly ("what do you think?"), not just stating an opinion.
  2. Each turn responds to what was just said before adding something new — that's genuine back-and-forth, not parallel monologues.
  3. The disagreement is handled politely and productively, and it actually moves the discussion forward toward a decision.
  4. The weak version never reacts to the partner's point and never reaches an actual joint decision — both are core Interactive Communication failures.
Try

Spot the weakness

Each clip is two candidates discussing the prompts described in the transcript. Listen, then decide which of the four criteria is the exchange's biggest problem.

Try score: 0 / 3
Now it's your turn — scroll down to Apply for a timed practice discussion with a real discussion card, a self-check, and a full model exchange.
Apply

Timed practice

This isn't machine-scored. With a partner (or thinking through both sides yourself), discuss the card below, then agree on an answer to the decision question before the timer runs out. Then self-check your own performance and compare it with a strong and a weak model exchange.

Here's a discussion card like the one you'd see in the real test. Discuss it with a partner, then decide together.

Some people think schools should do more to help students manage stress, and other people think students should learn to manage it on their own. Here are some things to think about:

exam pressure exercise breathing techniques staying organized sleep

Now decide together which of these approaches would help most, and why.

03:00

Complete the timed practice above to unlock the self-check and model answers.

Self-check

Interactive Communication
Interactive Communication
Discourse Management
Interactive Communication

This self-check is a reflection tool, not a score. Speaking is assessed by a person against these four criteria across the whole test, not per answer.

Model exchanges

Strong example
Ready

A: I think the exercise one and the breathing one are the two that would actually work in the moment, right before something stressful. What do you think? B: I agree exercise is good, but I'd actually pick the planner instead of breathing, because a lot of stress comes from feeling disorganized in the first place. A: That's fair, I hadn't thought about it that way. Maybe it depends whether the stress is short-term, like right before an exam, or something building up over weeks. B: Exactly. So could we say exercise for the short-term panic, and the planner for the longer build-up? A: Yeah, let's go with that — it covers both situations.

Genuine back-and-forth throughout: each turn builds on the last, the disagreement is handled productively, and they land on a real, negotiated joint decision rather than one person simply winning.
Weak example
Ready

A: I think sleep is the most important one. B: I think exercise is the best one. A: Breathing is also good, I do that sometimes. B: The planner is useful too, for school. A: Okay.

Five separate opinions with zero reaction between them, and no attempt at a joint decision at the end. This is the most common way marks are lost in Part 3 — not disagreement itself, but never actually engaging with the other person's point.
Saved. Your progress on the course map will update the next time you visit it.