B2 First · Speaking · Module 5, Lesson 2

Part 2: Long Turn

You get two photos on a theme and about a minute to compare them, on your own, without interruption. It's the one part of the test where you have to keep talking — running out of things to say costs more than any single grammar mistake.

~1 min turn Two photos, one theme Partner gives a short reply after No preparation time
Learn

What this part really tests

The examiner shows you two photos on a shared theme and asks you to compare them, then answer a short question about them — roughly a minute of uninterrupted speech. This is the part of the test where Discourse Management does the most work: can you organize, extend, and sustain a turn on your own, with no back-and-forth to lean on.

The examiner's method

  1. Don't describe each photo separately — actively compare them ("Both photos show…, but…").
  2. Speculate on feelings, reasons, and context, not just what's visible ("I imagine she feels…", "They might be doing this because…").
  3. Use signposting language to organize your turn: firstly, in the first photo, moving to the second, overall.
  4. Keep track of time so you reach the specific follow-up question at the end — don't run the clock out mid-description.

Language for comparing and speculating

Comparing
Both photos show… · Unlike the first photo… · One thing they have in common is… · Whereas in the second photo…
Speculating
I imagine… · It looks like… · They might be feeling… · I'd guess that…
The follow-up question
In my opinion… · I think… · Personally speaking…
Buying a second to think
Well, let me think… · That's an interesting question… · If I had to choose…

Traps that cost marks

Two descriptions, not one comparison
Listing what's in Photo A, then separately what's in Photo B, without ever actually comparing them.
Running dry
Silence before the minute is up is one of the most costly things that can happen in this part — it directly undermines Discourse Management.
Skipping the question
Spending the whole turn on description and never actually answering the specific question the examiner asked at the end.
Rushing
Trying to mention every visual detail at high speed instead of speaking at a natural pace — this usually hurts Pronunciation and Grammar accuracy together.

Worked example

Picture two photos on the theme "trying something for the first time": Photo A shows a teenager in a kitchen, carefully measuring flour with a recipe book open beside them. Photo B shows an older man at a table, looking at a phone screen while a younger person points something out on it.

Weak: "In the first photo there is a boy. He is cooking. There is flour and a book. In the second photo there is a man. He has a phone. A woman is next to him." (Stops after about 20 seconds — two lists, no comparison, no speculation.)

Strong: "Both photos show someone trying something new, but at very different stages of life. In the first, the teenager looks really focused, maybe a little nervous, like it's their first time following a recipe alone. The second photo is almost the reverse situation — here it's an older person learning something new from someone younger, which I imagine takes a certain amount of patience, and maybe some humility too. What they both have in common, though, is that neither person looks totally confident yet."

  1. The strong answer opens by naming the shared theme immediately, then flags a contrast ("at very different stages of life") — that's genuine comparison, not two lists.
  2. It speculates twice ("maybe a little nervous", "I imagine takes... patience") instead of only describing what's visible.
  3. It closes by returning to a similarity, which naturally fills time and demonstrates real comparative thinking rather than running out of content.
  4. The weak answer never uses a single comparing or speculating phrase — it is two separate, static descriptions, and it stops well before a full minute.
Try

Spot the weakness

Each clip is a real long-turn answer on a photo theme described in the transcript. Listen, then decide which of the four criteria is the answer's biggest problem.

Try score: 0 / 3
Now it's your turn — scroll down to Apply for a timed practice long turn with real photos, a self-check, and full model answers.
Apply

Timed practice

This isn't machine-scored. Speak for the full minute without stopping, comparing the two photos below and finishing with the follow-up question. Then self-check your own performance and compare it with a strong and a weak model answer.

Compare these two photos of people trying something new for the first time. Say what you think each person is feeling, then answer the question below.

A teenager concentrating while measuring flour into a bowl, a recipe book open on the counter
Photo A
An older man being shown something on a smartphone by a younger relative, seated at a table with tea and a biscuit
Photo B

Which do you think is harder to learn as an adult — a practical skill, or how to use new technology?

01:00

Complete the timed practice above to unlock the self-check and model answers.

Self-check

Discourse Management
Discourse Management
Grammar & Vocabulary
Interactive Communication

This self-check is a reflection tool, not a score. Speaking is assessed by a person against these four criteria across the whole test, not per answer.

Model answers

Strong example
Ready

Both photos show someone trying something new, but at very different stages of life. In the first, the teenager looks really focused, maybe a little nervous, like it's their first time following a recipe completely alone. The second photo feels almost like the reverse situation — here it's an older person learning something new from someone younger, which I imagine takes real patience, and maybe a bit of humility too, since it's not always easy to be the one being taught for once. What they both have in common, though, is that neither person looks fully confident yet. As for which is harder — I'd actually say technology, because a recipe eventually just becomes memory, but technology keeps changing, so you're never quite finished learning it.

This runs the full minute without gaps, compares rather than lists, speculates twice, and lands cleanly on the follow-up question with a clear, justified opinion. Strong across Discourse Management and Grammar & Vocabulary.
Weak example
Ready

In the first photo there is a boy. He is cooking. There is flour and a book on the table. He looks careful. In the second photo there is a man. He has a phone. A person is next to him and is showing him something. That's all.

Two separate lists, zero comparing or speculating language, and it stops at around twenty seconds with no attempt at the follow-up question. This is the single most common way marks are lost in Part 2 — not bad grammar, but running out of organized things to say.
Saved. Your progress on the course map will update the next time you visit it.